www.trncinfo.com

 
 
 
 
 

make money stuffing envelopes

 

Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus

  Articals and Comments 

Archive

Turkey, Greece and Cyprus - by Orhan H. SÜLEYMAN (Vice-President of Maryland American Turkish Association) - The Washington Times/Letters  - 2 December 2006

Turkey, Greece and Cyprus

Nick Larigakis’ Nov. 24 letter, "Turkey’s EU problem", once again demonstrates how truth and honesty are irrelevant when it comes to Turkish issues. The American Hellenic Institute does Greek Americans a disservice. Serving one’s constituency should not mean carrying the passion of hatred and vitriol for eternity, but facing the truth and attempting to solve problems and improve relations.

The 1960 Treaty of Guarantee for Cyprus, an instrument of international law, not only empowered, but required "concerted or unilateral action" when circumstances such as those prevailing on Cyprus in 1974 existed. This made Turkey’s intervention legal. Even without such legal justification, Turkey was right morally because it was an accepted fact that the Turkish Cypriots stood on the brink of extermination at the hands of the organizers of the Greek coup d’etat. Turkey’s military action was unable to prevent the mass murders of Turkish Cypriots in remote villages in the Famagusta district. The record shows that there were no similar atrocities against Greek Cypriots.

The U.N. resolutions to which Mr. Larigakis refers in his letter do not talk about the withdrawal of Turkish troops alone, but the withdrawal of all non-Cypriot forces in the context of a political settlement, including the thousands of Greek troops and the 20 generals from the mainland who commanded them.

Recently, the failed Annan Plan proposed a phased withdrawal of all military forces, yet Greek Cypriots overwhelmingly rejected it, while Turkish Cypriots accepted it. This begs the question: Who truly wants a solution to Cyprus?

In order to refute the statement that "Turkish Cypriots were never held hostage by Greek Cypriots", it would suffice to look at the U.N. Secretary-General’s report dated Sept. 10, 1964 (S/5950), which states that the restrictions imposed on the Turkish Cypriots in that period amounted to a "veritable siege". As far as the Turkish intervention in 1974, is concerned, the German newspaper Die Zeit put it best when it reported in its issue of Aug. 30, 1974, that "the massacre of Turkish Cypriots in Paphos and Famagusta is the proof of how justified the Turks were to undertake their second (August) intervention".

In the final analysis, neither accusations and counteraccusations nor exploitation of the international legal system will resolve the Cyprus issue, but the two parties themselves in direct, face-to-face negotiations. We urge our Greek Cypriot opponents, particularly the members of the Greek-American community who consistently take an aggressive, often hostile attitude toward their Turkish counterparts, to refrain from this counterproductive campaign and help in the process of building bridges of trust and cooperation between the two communities in Cyprus.


[ Webmaster]