|
Opening
up of borders- Reactions show
which side is prepared for reconciliation and which side is not
By
Uli Piller, TRNC Honorary Representative in Munich/ Germany
The
TRNC opend its border to the Greek Cypriot side and is blamed for that step.
Turkish Cypriots from now on have the chance to go to the Greek Cypriot side
and visit people there and also the other way round. It was a wise step
taken by the Turkish Cypriot government and President Denktaþ. The Greek
Cypriot authorities immediately have reacted in their typical style, but the
world and especially the media keep silent. The Greek Cypriot government
says: To open the border is not enough, only to give up sovereignty will do.
They don’t allow TRNC citizens of Turkis origin who live in Cyprus since
almost three decades to pass the checkpoints and they refuse all tourists,
because they entered Cyprus through “illegal” ports and airports. And
the TRNC is blamed for blocking all negotiations, Denktaþ is wrongly and
unfairly blamed for not moving a little step towards the Greek Cypriots.
Fact is, since 1963 they have never moved a single step towards the Turkish
Cypriots. And they have found their own mouthpiece: The United Nations. That
the TRNC did not accept the Annan Plan for Cyprus was evident and also the
Greeks did not like that plan – and that is proof enough that this plan
would not have worked in Cyprus. Shortly after the negotiations came to an
end in The Hague in March, TRNC President Rauf Denktaþ offered his Greek
Cypriot counterpart, Tassos Papadopoulos to negotiate further and he also
offered concrete points to discuss about. Regarding the decision to open the
border for daily visits part of the President’s confidence building
measures, it was only a logical step to prove the Turkish Cypriots’ will
to co-exist in Cyprus as peaceful neighbours. The reaction from the Greek
part of Cyprus was all but encouraging. They say that they can`t accept the
TRNC controlling Greek Cypriot passports, when Greek Cypriots pass the Ledra
Palace checkpoint in Nicosia. They say, if they did so it was a recognition
of the TRNC and that was Denktaþ’s only aim. Is that the new way the
Greek Cypriots are speaking about? Is that their pragmatical solution they
are seeking? If yes, Turkish Cypriots should never hesitate and support the
government and the president.
When
the Greek Cypriot part of Cyprus was accepted as EU member, the Greek Prime
Minister Kostas Simitis came to the island to celebrate ENOSIS as he later
said. Greek Cypriots and Greeks now feel united under the roof of the
European Union – and they know about the advantages of being two countries
speaking with one voice. No good times for Turkey and the TRNC (especially
as long as Verheugen is member of the EU Commission). Simitis came to say
ENOSIS was done. What does this mean for the TRNC and the Turkish Cypriots?
At the moment nothing at all, because the TRNC government and President
Denktaþ wisely refused the Annan Plan. But if they had accepted the UN
Secretary General’s proposals it would have led to a Greek Cypriot
dominated state in Cyprus with some 100 000 Turkish Cypriots to leave their
villages, with a government dominated by Greek Cypriots and – most
important – with a Greek Cypriot controlled economy. Those Turkish
Cypriots longing for a better life at present, forget, how high the price is
and how little the profit for the TRNC might be if the Annan Plan were to
come true.
Nevertheless
the Turkish Cypriot leadership always saw and still sees the necessity of a
solution which leeds to guaranteed peace and stability in Cyprus, which
gives the Turkish Cypriots their own land and makes sure that their economy
will prosper. Acting in that concern it was President Denktaþ who invited
his counterpart Klerides in 2001 to negotiate, it was the TRNC President who
said it was necessary to find a solution. And it was the Greek Cypriot
government which never moved a single step towards a partnership. Having
usurped the illegal title as government of whole Cyprus it is easy for them
to blame the TRNC leadership and demand hegemonial rule over Cyprus.
Finally: And we once more witnessed this approach when the Papadopoulos
government did not evaluate the decision to allow border crossing in a
positive light but claims to support a solution which would not work, but
only help their political strategies.
|