|
Are you embarrassed by the president
A MAN’S thoughts, expressed orally or in written
form, are a reflection of his personality. Some
months ago, commenting on some incoherent and
bizarre public statements by President Papadopoulos,
I had suggested that Demetris Christofias and other
top state officials investigated whether there was
anything seriously wrong with him. On New Year’s Day
and January 3, Phileleftheros published an
ultra-long interview with the president. Below are
some of his responses, which require no explanation
or comment from me.
l "One of the wise should tell me what he means with
‘we must undertake initiatives’. Is the EU an office
to which I can go, knock on the door and ask what it
will do about the Cyprus problem? On December 31,
the Dutch presidency ran its course and Luxembourg
has taken over. So we have the Presidency and the
European Commission in which there are employees who
do not shape policy."
l "When I go to speak to some people, apart from
those who know the Cyprus problem well, Finland,
Latvia etc, they tell me ‘we hear that you do not
want a settlement’. They maintain that this is what
the newspapers write and the serious Parties say. To
achieve what? Whether they like it or not, I was
elected for five years."
l "I never said that the basis for the talks is the
Annan plan. The plan is a basis for negotiations."
l "(Spanish Prime Minister) Mr Zapatero came under
tremendous pressure to cancel the meeting, to
downgrade it or to also meet with Mr Talat. They had
even told him not to talk to me and for the foreign
minister to meet me. He did not give in and the
visit was a working visit; there was also a welcome
with a guard of honour. Consequently, there is no
reason for me to announce the contact I will have in
advance and trigger pressure."
l "Are political issues resolved by the (type of)
climate? If Mr Blair kisses me, will it mean the
climate has improved."
l "I am in favour of clearly spelt out views. We do
not need to experience what we experienced with the
Annan plan. We saw what happened to us thanks to our
vagueness. I am against vagueness. I state my
position and if they do not like it too bad."
l "I am not interested in helping journalists
finding news stories with which to fill their
pages."
l "A minister says, for example, that it is time to
send a rocket to the moon. I will tell him to submit
his proposal and ask him whether he thought what
germs the rocket would bring back on its return.
This is what I do. From then on, it is his business
and he will also have to persuade his colleagues.
The other day (at the council of ministers’ meeting)
we took a decision with six votes in favour and five
against. I did not vote nor did I express a view.
Some friends have said that my column deals
excessively with Papadopoulos. I plead guilty to the
charge. But on the other hand, can a columnist
ignore all these weighty utterances? Unbelievable as
it may seem, all the incoherence reported above is a
reflection of the thinking of the man who is
currently President of the Cyprus Republic, a
member-state of the European Union. In other words,
the subject has a broader European interest.
This is why tomorrow I will send a copy of this
comment to the employees of the European Commission
and to Mr Zapatero. If some readers are embarrassed
about our president they should not be too harsh on
him. Papadopoulos is not to blame for anything. They
put him there and he is doing his best. If you think
it is just not good enough, your should call Mr
Christofias and politely tell him: I am embarrassed
by the president you imposed on us. Are you? |