|
Article
written by H.E. Mr. Rauf R. Denktaþ, President of the Turkish Republic of
Northern Cyprus, which was published in the Slovakian daily, ‘SME’, on
23 October 2001.
The
full text of the article is as follows;
Who
Is Today On the Threshold Of A New Crisis Interested In Cyprus?
Project
Syndicate
By Rauf R. Denktaþ (Author is President of the Turkish Republic of Northern
Cyprus)
Cyprus
is on the threshold of a new crisis, however, nobody cares since the
world’s eyes concentrate on Usama bin Ladin and Taliban today. The lack of
interest is dangerous because it might evoke a feeling – that is, afterall,
relatively widespread among followers of Islam, namely that Muslims have
always been treated unfairly, regardless from the extent to which their
matter is justified.
In
1960, Turkish Cypriots together with their Greek partners co-founded the
Republic of Cyprus. Greek Cypriots drove them away from the partnership 37
years ago. The Turkish Cypriots are at present facing another injustice,
this time it is being prepared by the European Union that is contemplating
to grant membership to the Greek part of Cyprus.
Agreements
on the foundation of Cyprus of 1960 stipulate that the Greek Cypriot side
will never assume exclusive power over the government. However, this is
exactly what the Greek Cypriots did in 1963, thus violating the rights of
the Turkish Cypriots. A civil war, invasion and division of Cyprus followed.
Although the feud between the communities in the island has lasted for
decades, now the EU itself is going to breach the basic agreements – by
acknowledgement of and granting membership in the EU only to the Greek part
of the island, the basic legal document of the Republic of Cyprus would
cease to apply.
How
come? At the time of its foundation, the Republic of Cyprus consisted of two-co-founding
sides, the Greek and the Turkish community. Each community elected its own
representatives. Thus a legitimate Cypriot government could exist ony if
there were separately elected representatives of the two groups sitting side
by side. One side is not entitled to represent the second one. In the same
way, one side has no right to claim that it represents the legitimate
government of the Republic of Cyprus.
The
EU contemplates over membership of the Greek part of Cyprus based on an
assumption that the Republic of Cyprus of 1960 still exists. All the
involved but not well-informed sides – the USA, Great Britain and also EU
at present – nourish the appearance that the bi-national, bi-religious and
bi-lingual state, the Republic of Cyprus (that the Greek Cypriots destroyed),
continues somehow to exist in the part of the island controlled by the Greek
Cypriots. Non-acknowledgement of the fundamental violation of Cypriot
agreements has been blocking reconciliation for a total of 37 years.
Glafkos
Klerides, leader of the Greek Cypriots, wrote about plans to destroy the
partnership with the aim to change it into the Greek Republic of Cyprus, in
his memoirs My Desposition in the time of the division (already in
1963): “Just as the Greek Cypriot preoccupation was that Cyprus should be
a Greek Cypriot State, with a protected Turkish Cypriot minority, the
Turkish preoccupation was to defeat any such effort and maintain the
partnership concept, which in their opinion the Zurich Agreement created
between the two communities. The conflict, therefore, was a conflict of
principle and for that principle both sides were prepared to go on arguing
and even, if need be, to fight, rather than compromise... The same principle
is still in conflict, even today...”
If
the Greek Cypriot side will continue to be viewed as the only real
“Cypriot government”, it will inevitably destroy any potential will to
restore the partnership between the two communities. For an end to the
division of Cyprus is not possible without adherence to the legal order, it
means that both the former co-founders of the Republic of Cyprus have to be
treated equally.
However,
the EU processes the one-sided application of the Greek Cypriots to join the
EU as a binding request of “Cyprus”, although the Turkish Cypriot co-founders
of the republic protest against it. If the Greek Cypriot side continues to
be supported in the efforts to be “the only legitimate government of
Cyprus”, the gap between the two communities can only deepen. The EU
closes its eyes in front of our basic constitutional principle, according to
which Cyprus should be governed together by both of the national communities.
Moreover, European officials added fuel to the flames by saying that the
Turkish Cypriots had no right to veto the request of the Greek Cypriots.
The
EU perhaps does not realize the significance of its deeds, but the Greek
Cypriots know what they are doing. The Greek Cypriots say openly that their
request to join the EU is a way how to achieve unification with Greece.
“In 1955-59 we had a vision: unification with Greece. Today... entering
the future with courageous mind, we attach a new meaning to the Cypriot
Hellenism: link to/unification with Europe and, at the same time, with
Greece.” Greek Cypriot “Haravgi” daily quoted on 10 April of this year
Nikos Anastasiades, chairman of the governing DISI party in the island’s
south part, which is controlled by Greek Cypriots.
This
is the EU’s dilemma: will they ignore the partnership agreement of 1960,
based on which the Republic of Cyprus was founded and according to which
sovereign commitments, as for example accession to the EU without the
consent of the Turkish Cypriots are unconstitutional? Will the European
Union realize that ignorance of the fact will destroy the balance of the
international agreements of 1960 (signed by Turkey, Turkish Cypriots, Greece,
Greek Cypriots and Great Britain) based on which a republic was founded in
the island, and that such a breach might again endanger peace and stability
in the region.
If
the EU accepts Greece as its member, the outcome will be an indirect link
with Greece. However, the Turkish Cypriots will not submit to the injustice.
Moreover, Turkey will also not reconcile to the humiliation. “Our reaction
will not be stopped by anything,” said Turkish Minister of Foreign Affairs
Ismail Cem.
The
EU should pursue the legal order instead of evoking risks and sprinkle salt
on the wound of injured pride of the Islam world. The EU can not consider
the request of the Greek Cypriots as a request of the whole Republic of
Cyprus. It should help Northern Cyprus to fulfill the economic criteria for
entry to the EU and synchronize the entry of the Cypriot confederation, that
means Cyprus as whole to the EU, together with Turkey. Cyprus’ accession
to the EU might be delayed due to this, however, it will be definitely
better than chaos that/the European union/would cause by its attitude not
only in the island but all over the eastern Mediterranean.
|